In my opinion
the Championship Decoys were nothing short of amazing. Yes some rules per se were ‘bent’. Every dog was ‘tested’ differently and each dog’s
weaknesses, whether character or training related, were exposed. The Decoys did their job. As did the Decoys in Virginia last year,
where a number of individuals complained.
The Decoys were not brutal. The
Decoys were fast and had virtually flawless technique. The baton was never laid hard on the dogs
and never straight down on the spine.
The speed and the intensity with which the Decoys performed can never be
mistaken for brutality! My dog Jason
was hit in the head once, as can be seen in the video. He came off for a split second and without
hesitation came through again. When
Frank Germain saw that he had hit the dog on the head, he immediately
readjusted the baton for proper placement.
If you watch carefully, it was the dog that pulled, torqued and moved
underneath the baton as it came down.
This was NOT intentional. A
decoy cannot control or predict 100%, the speed, strength, and movement that a
dog has in a 15 second fight. These
Decoys didn’t need to wield a baton in order to support their intensity. Anyone that was there, saw several dogs get
intimidated or stopped in their tracks just by the body language and eye
contact that Didier gave on the escorts, guards etc…Let’s give credit where
it’s due. Maybe these Decoys are just
too good for the training our dogs are receiving?!?! Rather than criticize and condemn their talents, why not critique
OUR own training techniques? There is a
reason these 2 Decoys are so popular and in demand in France. Didier, from what I’ve been told, has decoyed
since he was 14! I believe he is 31
now. In his first year as National
Select, he decoyed 100 trials! If we
want to be on par with the French, play a French sport, and be judged as the
French are judged, then we have to be prepared to play by the same ‘rules’, and
modify our training techniques. On a
more positive note, there were many dogs in various levels that withstood the
work of these Decoys! These dogs and their
trainers have to be highly commended!
To be quite
honest, I would rather trial my dogs under the French than the domestic
Decoys. I’ve seen some Decoys swing and
hit the dogs without even being able to see them. Unfortunately, they lacked experience and/or technique. From my own personal experience, a French
Decoy has never hurt my dogs. I wish I
could say the same for SOME of our decoys.
Earlier this year, I had my dog hit several times in a row behind the
ear at the base of the skull. I had it
videotaped and the Decoy reviewed the tape.
After viewing it, I reminded him (not too nicely) that perhaps he should
read the rules as to where the baton may be placed safely…In the 15 second
face, not once was the baton placed properly.
His comment to me was flippant as he replied; ‘I didn’t hit him hard
enough to kill him’. I was appalled by
the lack of integrity he had for the sport and the animal. Given a choice to trial under SOME of our
decoys, or under the French decoys, I’ll take my ‘chances’ with the French. In the last 18 mos. I’ve had 3 trials in a
row where the baton was used improperly by a few of our decoys. I’ve seen more dogs hurt through
incompetence, than due to the speed and intensity as seen in the French Decoys.
I love the
sport, but I love my dog even more…I can only hope that one day, North America will
be able to ‘produce’ Decoys as capable and talented as the French…
Respectfully,
Brigita Brinac
& Jason
If you would like to submit an article, please feel free to do so.
Send your attachment via e-mail, and upon approval, the article will be published!
All articles must be working dog related!